The Runtime Complexity (full) of the given CpxTRS could be proven to be BOUNDS(n^1, INF).

(0) Obligation:

Runtime Complexity TRS:
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

minus(x, 0) → x
minus(s(x), s(y)) → minus(x, y)
quot(0, s(y)) → 0
quot(s(x), s(y)) → s(quot(minus(x, y), s(y)))
le(0, y) → true
le(s(x), 0) → false
le(s(x), s(y)) → le(x, y)
inc(s(x)) → s(inc(x))
inc(0) → s(0)
log(x) → logIter(x, 0)
logIter(x, y) → if(le(s(0), x), le(s(s(0)), x), quot(x, s(s(0))), inc(y))
if(false, b, x, y) → logZeroError
if(true, false, x, s(y)) → y
if(true, true, x, y) → logIter(x, y)

Rewrite Strategy: FULL

(1) DecreasingLoopProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

The following loop(s) give(s) rise to the lower bound Ω(n¹):
The rewrite sequence
minus(s(x), s(y)) →⁺ minus(x, y)
gives rise to a decreasing loop by considering the right hand sides subterm at position [].
The pumping substitution is [x / s(x), y / s(y)].
The result substitution is [ ].

(2) BOUNDS(n^1, INF)

(3) RenamingProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

Renamed function symbols to avoid clashes with predefined symbol.

(4) Obligation:

Runtime Complexity Relative TRS:
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

minus(x, 0') → x
minus(s(x), s(y)) → minus(x, y)
quot(0', s(y)) → 0'
quot(s(x), s(y)) → s(quot(minus(x, y), s(y)))
le(0', y) → true
le(s(x), 0') → false
le(s(x), s(y)) → le(x, y)
inc(s(x)) → s(inc(x))
inc(0') → s(0')
log(x) → logIter(x, 0')
logIter(x, y) → if(le(s(0'), x), le(s(s(0')), x), quot(x, s(s(0'))), inc(y))
if(false, b, x, y) → logZeroError
if(true, false, x, s(y)) → y
if(true, true, x, y) → logIter(x, y)

S is empty.
Rewrite Strategy: FULL

(5) TypeInferenceProof (BOTH BOUNDS(ID, ID) transformation)

Infered types.

(6) Obligation:

TRS:
Rules:
minus(x, 0') → x
minus(s(x), s(y)) → minus(x, y)
quot(0', s(y)) → 0'
quot(s(x), s(y)) → s(quot(minus(x, y), s(y)))
le(0', y) → true
le(s(x), 0') → false
le(s(x), s(y)) → le(x, y)
inc(s(x)) → s(inc(x))
inc(0') → s(0')
log(x) → logIter(x, 0')
logIter(x, y) → if(le(s(0'), x), le(s(s(0')), x), quot(x, s(s(0'))), inc(y))
if(false, b, x, y) → logZeroError
if(true, false, x, s(y)) → y
if(true, true, x, y) → logIter(x, y)

Types:
minus :: 0':s:logZeroError → 0':s:logZeroError → 0':s:logZeroError
0' :: 0':s:logZeroError
s :: 0':s:logZeroError → 0':s:logZeroError
quot :: 0':s:logZeroError → 0':s:logZeroError → 0':s:logZeroError
le :: 0':s:logZeroError → 0':s:logZeroError → true:false
true :: true:false
false :: true:false
inc :: 0':s:logZeroError → 0':s:logZeroError
log :: 0':s:logZeroError → 0':s:logZeroError
logIter :: 0':s:logZeroError → 0':s:logZeroError → 0':s:logZeroError
if :: true:false → true:false → 0':s:logZeroError → 0':s:logZeroError → 0':s:logZeroError
logZeroError :: 0':s:logZeroError
hole_0':s:logZeroError1_0 :: 0':s:logZeroError
hole_true:false2_0 :: true:false
gen_0':s:logZeroError3_0 :: Nat → 0':s:logZeroError

(7) OrderProof (LOWER BOUND(ID) transformation)

Heuristically decided to analyse the following defined symbols:
minus, quot, le, inc, logIter

They will be analysed ascendingly in the following order:
minus < quot
quot < logIter
le < logIter
inc < logIter

(8) Obligation:

TRS:
Rules:
minus(x, 0') → x
minus(s(x), s(y)) → minus(x, y)
quot(0', s(y)) → 0'
quot(s(x), s(y)) → s(quot(minus(x, y), s(y)))
le(0', y) → true
le(s(x), 0') → false
le(s(x), s(y)) → le(x, y)
inc(s(x)) → s(inc(x))
inc(0') → s(0')
log(x) → logIter(x, 0')
logIter(x, y) → if(le(s(0'), x), le(s(s(0')), x), quot(x, s(s(0'))), inc(y))
if(false, b, x, y) → logZeroError
if(true, false, x, s(y)) → y
if(true, true, x, y) → logIter(x, y)

Types:
minus :: 0':s:logZeroError → 0':s:logZeroError → 0':s:logZeroError
0' :: 0':s:logZeroError
s :: 0':s:logZeroError → 0':s:logZeroError
quot :: 0':s:logZeroError → 0':s:logZeroError → 0':s:logZeroError
le :: 0':s:logZeroError → 0':s:logZeroError → true:false
true :: true:false
false :: true:false
inc :: 0':s:logZeroError → 0':s:logZeroError
log :: 0':s:logZeroError → 0':s:logZeroError
logIter :: 0':s:logZeroError → 0':s:logZeroError → 0':s:logZeroError
if :: true:false → true:false → 0':s:logZeroError → 0':s:logZeroError → 0':s:logZeroError
logZeroError :: 0':s:logZeroError
hole_0':s:logZeroError1_0 :: 0':s:logZeroError
hole_true:false2_0 :: true:false
gen_0':s:logZeroError3_0 :: Nat → 0':s:logZeroError

Generator Equations:
gen_0':s:logZeroError3_0(0) ⇔ 0'
gen_0':s:logZeroError3_0(+(x, 1)) ⇔ s(gen_0':s:logZeroError3_0(x))

The following defined symbols remain to be analysed:
minus, quot, le, inc, logIter

They will be analysed ascendingly in the following order:
minus < quot
quot < logIter
le < logIter
inc < logIter

(9) RewriteLemmaProof (LOWER BOUND(ID) transformation)

Proved the following rewrite lemma:
minus(gen_0':s:logZeroError3_0(n5_0), gen_0':s:logZeroError3_0(n5_0)) → gen_0':s:logZeroError3_0(0), rt ∈ Ω(1 + n5₀)

Induction Base:
minus(gen_0':s:logZeroError3_0(0), gen_0':s:logZeroError3_0(0)) →_R^Ω(1)
gen_0':s:logZeroError3_0(0)

Induction Step:
minus(gen_0':s:logZeroError3_0(+(n5_0, 1)), gen_0':s:logZeroError3_0(+(n5_0, 1))) →_R^Ω(1)
minus(gen_0':s:logZeroError3_0(n5_0), gen_0':s:logZeroError3_0(n5_0)) →_IH
gen_0':s:logZeroError3_0(0)

We have rt ∈ Ω(n¹) and sz ∈ O(n). Thus, we have irc_R ∈ Ω(n).

(10) Complex Obligation (BEST)

(11) Obligation:

TRS:
Rules:
minus(x, 0') → x
minus(s(x), s(y)) → minus(x, y)
quot(0', s(y)) → 0'
quot(s(x), s(y)) → s(quot(minus(x, y), s(y)))
le(0', y) → true
le(s(x), 0') → false
le(s(x), s(y)) → le(x, y)
inc(s(x)) → s(inc(x))
inc(0') → s(0')
log(x) → logIter(x, 0')
logIter(x, y) → if(le(s(0'), x), le(s(s(0')), x), quot(x, s(s(0'))), inc(y))
if(false, b, x, y) → logZeroError
if(true, false, x, s(y)) → y
if(true, true, x, y) → logIter(x, y)

Types:
minus :: 0':s:logZeroError → 0':s:logZeroError → 0':s:logZeroError
0' :: 0':s:logZeroError
s :: 0':s:logZeroError → 0':s:logZeroError
quot :: 0':s:logZeroError → 0':s:logZeroError → 0':s:logZeroError
le :: 0':s:logZeroError → 0':s:logZeroError → true:false
true :: true:false
false :: true:false
inc :: 0':s:logZeroError → 0':s:logZeroError
log :: 0':s:logZeroError → 0':s:logZeroError
logIter :: 0':s:logZeroError → 0':s:logZeroError → 0':s:logZeroError
if :: true:false → true:false → 0':s:logZeroError → 0':s:logZeroError → 0':s:logZeroError
logZeroError :: 0':s:logZeroError
hole_0':s:logZeroError1_0 :: 0':s:logZeroError
hole_true:false2_0 :: true:false
gen_0':s:logZeroError3_0 :: Nat → 0':s:logZeroError

Lemmas:
minus(gen_0':s:logZeroError3_0(n5_0), gen_0':s:logZeroError3_0(n5_0)) → gen_0':s:logZeroError3_0(0), rt ∈ Ω(1 + n5₀)

Generator Equations:
gen_0':s:logZeroError3_0(0) ⇔ 0'
gen_0':s:logZeroError3_0(+(x, 1)) ⇔ s(gen_0':s:logZeroError3_0(x))

The following defined symbols remain to be analysed:
quot, le, inc, logIter

They will be analysed ascendingly in the following order:
quot < logIter
le < logIter
inc < logIter

(12) NoRewriteLemmaProof (LOWER BOUND(ID) transformation)

Could not prove a rewrite lemma for the defined symbol quot.

(13) Obligation:

TRS:
Rules:
minus(x, 0') → x
minus(s(x), s(y)) → minus(x, y)
quot(0', s(y)) → 0'
quot(s(x), s(y)) → s(quot(minus(x, y), s(y)))
le(0', y) → true
le(s(x), 0') → false
le(s(x), s(y)) → le(x, y)
inc(s(x)) → s(inc(x))
inc(0') → s(0')
log(x) → logIter(x, 0')
logIter(x, y) → if(le(s(0'), x), le(s(s(0')), x), quot(x, s(s(0'))), inc(y))
if(false, b, x, y) → logZeroError
if(true, false, x, s(y)) → y
if(true, true, x, y) → logIter(x, y)

Types:
minus :: 0':s:logZeroError → 0':s:logZeroError → 0':s:logZeroError
0' :: 0':s:logZeroError
s :: 0':s:logZeroError → 0':s:logZeroError
quot :: 0':s:logZeroError → 0':s:logZeroError → 0':s:logZeroError
le :: 0':s:logZeroError → 0':s:logZeroError → true:false
true :: true:false
false :: true:false
inc :: 0':s:logZeroError → 0':s:logZeroError
log :: 0':s:logZeroError → 0':s:logZeroError
logIter :: 0':s:logZeroError → 0':s:logZeroError → 0':s:logZeroError
if :: true:false → true:false → 0':s:logZeroError → 0':s:logZeroError → 0':s:logZeroError
logZeroError :: 0':s:logZeroError
hole_0':s:logZeroError1_0 :: 0':s:logZeroError
hole_true:false2_0 :: true:false
gen_0':s:logZeroError3_0 :: Nat → 0':s:logZeroError

Lemmas:
minus(gen_0':s:logZeroError3_0(n5_0), gen_0':s:logZeroError3_0(n5_0)) → gen_0':s:logZeroError3_0(0), rt ∈ Ω(1 + n5₀)

Generator Equations:
gen_0':s:logZeroError3_0(0) ⇔ 0'
gen_0':s:logZeroError3_0(+(x, 1)) ⇔ s(gen_0':s:logZeroError3_0(x))

The following defined symbols remain to be analysed:
le, inc, logIter

They will be analysed ascendingly in the following order:
le < logIter
inc < logIter

(14) RewriteLemmaProof (LOWER BOUND(ID) transformation)

Proved the following rewrite lemma:
le(gen_0':s:logZeroError3_0(n320_0), gen_0':s:logZeroError3_0(n320_0)) → true, rt ∈ Ω(1 + n320₀)

Induction Base:
le(gen_0':s:logZeroError3_0(0), gen_0':s:logZeroError3_0(0)) →_R^Ω(1)
true

Induction Step:
le(gen_0':s:logZeroError3_0(+(n320_0, 1)), gen_0':s:logZeroError3_0(+(n320_0, 1))) →_R^Ω(1)
le(gen_0':s:logZeroError3_0(n320_0), gen_0':s:logZeroError3_0(n320_0)) →_IH
true

We have rt ∈ Ω(n¹) and sz ∈ O(n). Thus, we have irc_R ∈ Ω(n).

(15) Complex Obligation (BEST)

(16) Obligation:

TRS:
Rules:
minus(x, 0') → x
minus(s(x), s(y)) → minus(x, y)
quot(0', s(y)) → 0'
quot(s(x), s(y)) → s(quot(minus(x, y), s(y)))
le(0', y) → true
le(s(x), 0') → false
le(s(x), s(y)) → le(x, y)
inc(s(x)) → s(inc(x))
inc(0') → s(0')
log(x) → logIter(x, 0')
logIter(x, y) → if(le(s(0'), x), le(s(s(0')), x), quot(x, s(s(0'))), inc(y))
if(false, b, x, y) → logZeroError
if(true, false, x, s(y)) → y
if(true, true, x, y) → logIter(x, y)

Types:
minus :: 0':s:logZeroError → 0':s:logZeroError → 0':s:logZeroError
0' :: 0':s:logZeroError
s :: 0':s:logZeroError → 0':s:logZeroError
quot :: 0':s:logZeroError → 0':s:logZeroError → 0':s:logZeroError
le :: 0':s:logZeroError → 0':s:logZeroError → true:false
true :: true:false
false :: true:false
inc :: 0':s:logZeroError → 0':s:logZeroError
log :: 0':s:logZeroError → 0':s:logZeroError
logIter :: 0':s:logZeroError → 0':s:logZeroError → 0':s:logZeroError
if :: true:false → true:false → 0':s:logZeroError → 0':s:logZeroError → 0':s:logZeroError
logZeroError :: 0':s:logZeroError
hole_0':s:logZeroError1_0 :: 0':s:logZeroError
hole_true:false2_0 :: true:false
gen_0':s:logZeroError3_0 :: Nat → 0':s:logZeroError

Lemmas:
minus(gen_0':s:logZeroError3_0(n5_0), gen_0':s:logZeroError3_0(n5_0)) → gen_0':s:logZeroError3_0(0), rt ∈ Ω(1 + n5₀)
le(gen_0':s:logZeroError3_0(n320_0), gen_0':s:logZeroError3_0(n320_0)) → true, rt ∈ Ω(1 + n320₀)

Generator Equations:
gen_0':s:logZeroError3_0(0) ⇔ 0'
gen_0':s:logZeroError3_0(+(x, 1)) ⇔ s(gen_0':s:logZeroError3_0(x))

The following defined symbols remain to be analysed:
inc, logIter

They will be analysed ascendingly in the following order:
inc < logIter

(17) RewriteLemmaProof (LOWER BOUND(ID) transformation)

Proved the following rewrite lemma:
inc(gen_0':s:logZeroError3_0(n621_0)) → gen_0':s:logZeroError3_0(+(1, n621_0)), rt ∈ Ω(1 + n621₀)

Induction Base:
inc(gen_0':s:logZeroError3_0(0)) →_R^Ω(1)
s(0')

Induction Step:
inc(gen_0':s:logZeroError3_0(+(n621_0, 1))) →_R^Ω(1)
s(inc(gen_0':s:logZeroError3_0(n621_0))) →_IH
s(gen_0':s:logZeroError3_0(+(1, c622_0)))

We have rt ∈ Ω(n¹) and sz ∈ O(n). Thus, we have irc_R ∈ Ω(n).

(18) Complex Obligation (BEST)

(19) Obligation:

TRS:
Rules:
minus(x, 0') → x
minus(s(x), s(y)) → minus(x, y)
quot(0', s(y)) → 0'
quot(s(x), s(y)) → s(quot(minus(x, y), s(y)))
le(0', y) → true
le(s(x), 0') → false
le(s(x), s(y)) → le(x, y)
inc(s(x)) → s(inc(x))
inc(0') → s(0')
log(x) → logIter(x, 0')
logIter(x, y) → if(le(s(0'), x), le(s(s(0')), x), quot(x, s(s(0'))), inc(y))
if(false, b, x, y) → logZeroError
if(true, false, x, s(y)) → y
if(true, true, x, y) → logIter(x, y)

Types:
minus :: 0':s:logZeroError → 0':s:logZeroError → 0':s:logZeroError
0' :: 0':s:logZeroError
s :: 0':s:logZeroError → 0':s:logZeroError
quot :: 0':s:logZeroError → 0':s:logZeroError → 0':s:logZeroError
le :: 0':s:logZeroError → 0':s:logZeroError → true:false
true :: true:false
false :: true:false
inc :: 0':s:logZeroError → 0':s:logZeroError
log :: 0':s:logZeroError → 0':s:logZeroError
logIter :: 0':s:logZeroError → 0':s:logZeroError → 0':s:logZeroError
if :: true:false → true:false → 0':s:logZeroError → 0':s:logZeroError → 0':s:logZeroError
logZeroError :: 0':s:logZeroError
hole_0':s:logZeroError1_0 :: 0':s:logZeroError
hole_true:false2_0 :: true:false
gen_0':s:logZeroError3_0 :: Nat → 0':s:logZeroError

Lemmas:
minus(gen_0':s:logZeroError3_0(n5_0), gen_0':s:logZeroError3_0(n5_0)) → gen_0':s:logZeroError3_0(0), rt ∈ Ω(1 + n5₀)
le(gen_0':s:logZeroError3_0(n320_0), gen_0':s:logZeroError3_0(n320_0)) → true, rt ∈ Ω(1 + n320₀)
inc(gen_0':s:logZeroError3_0(n621_0)) → gen_0':s:logZeroError3_0(+(1, n621_0)), rt ∈ Ω(1 + n621₀)

Generator Equations:
gen_0':s:logZeroError3_0(0) ⇔ 0'
gen_0':s:logZeroError3_0(+(x, 1)) ⇔ s(gen_0':s:logZeroError3_0(x))

The following defined symbols remain to be analysed:
logIter

(20) NoRewriteLemmaProof (LOWER BOUND(ID) transformation)

Could not prove a rewrite lemma for the defined symbol logIter.

(21) Obligation:

TRS:
Rules:
minus(x, 0') → x
minus(s(x), s(y)) → minus(x, y)
quot(0', s(y)) → 0'
quot(s(x), s(y)) → s(quot(minus(x, y), s(y)))
le(0', y) → true
le(s(x), 0') → false
le(s(x), s(y)) → le(x, y)
inc(s(x)) → s(inc(x))
inc(0') → s(0')
log(x) → logIter(x, 0')
logIter(x, y) → if(le(s(0'), x), le(s(s(0')), x), quot(x, s(s(0'))), inc(y))
if(false, b, x, y) → logZeroError
if(true, false, x, s(y)) → y
if(true, true, x, y) → logIter(x, y)

Types:
minus :: 0':s:logZeroError → 0':s:logZeroError → 0':s:logZeroError
0' :: 0':s:logZeroError
s :: 0':s:logZeroError → 0':s:logZeroError
quot :: 0':s:logZeroError → 0':s:logZeroError → 0':s:logZeroError
le :: 0':s:logZeroError → 0':s:logZeroError → true:false
true :: true:false
false :: true:false
inc :: 0':s:logZeroError → 0':s:logZeroError
log :: 0':s:logZeroError → 0':s:logZeroError
logIter :: 0':s:logZeroError → 0':s:logZeroError → 0':s:logZeroError
if :: true:false → true:false → 0':s:logZeroError → 0':s:logZeroError → 0':s:logZeroError
logZeroError :: 0':s:logZeroError
hole_0':s:logZeroError1_0 :: 0':s:logZeroError
hole_true:false2_0 :: true:false
gen_0':s:logZeroError3_0 :: Nat → 0':s:logZeroError

Lemmas:
minus(gen_0':s:logZeroError3_0(n5_0), gen_0':s:logZeroError3_0(n5_0)) → gen_0':s:logZeroError3_0(0), rt ∈ Ω(1 + n5₀)
le(gen_0':s:logZeroError3_0(n320_0), gen_0':s:logZeroError3_0(n320_0)) → true, rt ∈ Ω(1 + n320₀)
inc(gen_0':s:logZeroError3_0(n621_0)) → gen_0':s:logZeroError3_0(+(1, n621_0)), rt ∈ Ω(1 + n621₀)

Generator Equations:
gen_0':s:logZeroError3_0(0) ⇔ 0'
gen_0':s:logZeroError3_0(+(x, 1)) ⇔ s(gen_0':s:logZeroError3_0(x))

No more defined symbols left to analyse.

(22) LowerBoundsProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

The lowerbound Ω(n¹) was proven with the following lemma:
minus(gen_0':s:logZeroError3_0(n5_0), gen_0':s:logZeroError3_0(n5_0)) → gen_0':s:logZeroError3_0(0), rt ∈ Ω(1 + n5₀)

(23) BOUNDS(n^1, INF)

(24) Obligation:

TRS:
Rules:
minus(x, 0') → x
minus(s(x), s(y)) → minus(x, y)
quot(0', s(y)) → 0'
quot(s(x), s(y)) → s(quot(minus(x, y), s(y)))
le(0', y) → true
le(s(x), 0') → false
le(s(x), s(y)) → le(x, y)
inc(s(x)) → s(inc(x))
inc(0') → s(0')
log(x) → logIter(x, 0')
logIter(x, y) → if(le(s(0'), x), le(s(s(0')), x), quot(x, s(s(0'))), inc(y))
if(false, b, x, y) → logZeroError
if(true, false, x, s(y)) → y
if(true, true, x, y) → logIter(x, y)

Types:
minus :: 0':s:logZeroError → 0':s:logZeroError → 0':s:logZeroError
0' :: 0':s:logZeroError
s :: 0':s:logZeroError → 0':s:logZeroError
quot :: 0':s:logZeroError → 0':s:logZeroError → 0':s:logZeroError
le :: 0':s:logZeroError → 0':s:logZeroError → true:false
true :: true:false
false :: true:false
inc :: 0':s:logZeroError → 0':s:logZeroError
log :: 0':s:logZeroError → 0':s:logZeroError
logIter :: 0':s:logZeroError → 0':s:logZeroError → 0':s:logZeroError
if :: true:false → true:false → 0':s:logZeroError → 0':s:logZeroError → 0':s:logZeroError
logZeroError :: 0':s:logZeroError
hole_0':s:logZeroError1_0 :: 0':s:logZeroError
hole_true:false2_0 :: true:false
gen_0':s:logZeroError3_0 :: Nat → 0':s:logZeroError

Lemmas:
minus(gen_0':s:logZeroError3_0(n5_0), gen_0':s:logZeroError3_0(n5_0)) → gen_0':s:logZeroError3_0(0), rt ∈ Ω(1 + n5₀)
le(gen_0':s:logZeroError3_0(n320_0), gen_0':s:logZeroError3_0(n320_0)) → true, rt ∈ Ω(1 + n320₀)
inc(gen_0':s:logZeroError3_0(n621_0)) → gen_0':s:logZeroError3_0(+(1, n621_0)), rt ∈ Ω(1 + n621₀)

Generator Equations:
gen_0':s:logZeroError3_0(0) ⇔ 0'
gen_0':s:logZeroError3_0(+(x, 1)) ⇔ s(gen_0':s:logZeroError3_0(x))

No more defined symbols left to analyse.

(25) LowerBoundsProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

The lowerbound Ω(n¹) was proven with the following lemma:
minus(gen_0':s:logZeroError3_0(n5_0), gen_0':s:logZeroError3_0(n5_0)) → gen_0':s:logZeroError3_0(0), rt ∈ Ω(1 + n5₀)

(26) BOUNDS(n^1, INF)

(27) Obligation:

TRS:
Rules:
minus(x, 0') → x
minus(s(x), s(y)) → minus(x, y)
quot(0', s(y)) → 0'
quot(s(x), s(y)) → s(quot(minus(x, y), s(y)))
le(0', y) → true
le(s(x), 0') → false
le(s(x), s(y)) → le(x, y)
inc(s(x)) → s(inc(x))
inc(0') → s(0')
log(x) → logIter(x, 0')
logIter(x, y) → if(le(s(0'), x), le(s(s(0')), x), quot(x, s(s(0'))), inc(y))
if(false, b, x, y) → logZeroError
if(true, false, x, s(y)) → y
if(true, true, x, y) → logIter(x, y)

Types:
minus :: 0':s:logZeroError → 0':s:logZeroError → 0':s:logZeroError
0' :: 0':s:logZeroError
s :: 0':s:logZeroError → 0':s:logZeroError
quot :: 0':s:logZeroError → 0':s:logZeroError → 0':s:logZeroError
le :: 0':s:logZeroError → 0':s:logZeroError → true:false
true :: true:false
false :: true:false
inc :: 0':s:logZeroError → 0':s:logZeroError
log :: 0':s:logZeroError → 0':s:logZeroError
logIter :: 0':s:logZeroError → 0':s:logZeroError → 0':s:logZeroError
if :: true:false → true:false → 0':s:logZeroError → 0':s:logZeroError → 0':s:logZeroError
logZeroError :: 0':s:logZeroError
hole_0':s:logZeroError1_0 :: 0':s:logZeroError
hole_true:false2_0 :: true:false
gen_0':s:logZeroError3_0 :: Nat → 0':s:logZeroError

Lemmas:
minus(gen_0':s:logZeroError3_0(n5_0), gen_0':s:logZeroError3_0(n5_0)) → gen_0':s:logZeroError3_0(0), rt ∈ Ω(1 + n5₀)
le(gen_0':s:logZeroError3_0(n320_0), gen_0':s:logZeroError3_0(n320_0)) → true, rt ∈ Ω(1 + n320₀)

Generator Equations:
gen_0':s:logZeroError3_0(0) ⇔ 0'
gen_0':s:logZeroError3_0(+(x, 1)) ⇔ s(gen_0':s:logZeroError3_0(x))

No more defined symbols left to analyse.

(28) LowerBoundsProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

The lowerbound Ω(n¹) was proven with the following lemma:
minus(gen_0':s:logZeroError3_0(n5_0), gen_0':s:logZeroError3_0(n5_0)) → gen_0':s:logZeroError3_0(0), rt ∈ Ω(1 + n5₀)

(29) BOUNDS(n^1, INF)

(30) Obligation:

TRS:
Rules:
minus(x, 0') → x
minus(s(x), s(y)) → minus(x, y)
quot(0', s(y)) → 0'
quot(s(x), s(y)) → s(quot(minus(x, y), s(y)))
le(0', y) → true
le(s(x), 0') → false
le(s(x), s(y)) → le(x, y)
inc(s(x)) → s(inc(x))
inc(0') → s(0')
log(x) → logIter(x, 0')
logIter(x, y) → if(le(s(0'), x), le(s(s(0')), x), quot(x, s(s(0'))), inc(y))
if(false, b, x, y) → logZeroError
if(true, false, x, s(y)) → y
if(true, true, x, y) → logIter(x, y)

Types:
minus :: 0':s:logZeroError → 0':s:logZeroError → 0':s:logZeroError
0' :: 0':s:logZeroError
s :: 0':s:logZeroError → 0':s:logZeroError
quot :: 0':s:logZeroError → 0':s:logZeroError → 0':s:logZeroError
le :: 0':s:logZeroError → 0':s:logZeroError → true:false
true :: true:false
false :: true:false
inc :: 0':s:logZeroError → 0':s:logZeroError
log :: 0':s:logZeroError → 0':s:logZeroError
logIter :: 0':s:logZeroError → 0':s:logZeroError → 0':s:logZeroError
if :: true:false → true:false → 0':s:logZeroError → 0':s:logZeroError → 0':s:logZeroError
logZeroError :: 0':s:logZeroError
hole_0':s:logZeroError1_0 :: 0':s:logZeroError
hole_true:false2_0 :: true:false
gen_0':s:logZeroError3_0 :: Nat → 0':s:logZeroError

Lemmas:
minus(gen_0':s:logZeroError3_0(n5_0), gen_0':s:logZeroError3_0(n5_0)) → gen_0':s:logZeroError3_0(0), rt ∈ Ω(1 + n5₀)

Generator Equations:
gen_0':s:logZeroError3_0(0) ⇔ 0'
gen_0':s:logZeroError3_0(+(x, 1)) ⇔ s(gen_0':s:logZeroError3_0(x))

No more defined symbols left to analyse.

(31) LowerBoundsProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

The lowerbound Ω(n¹) was proven with the following lemma:
minus(gen_0':s:logZeroError3_0(n5_0), gen_0':s:logZeroError3_0(n5_0)) → gen_0':s:logZeroError3_0(0), rt ∈ Ω(1 + n5₀)

(32) BOUNDS(n^1, INF)